JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)June 18, 2019

A- de 2019

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Antonio José Lizarazo Ocampo

✓Claimant Daniel Antonio Guerrero Lizarazo

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Corte Constitucional
  • Improcedencia para continuar trámite de verificación de cumplimiento fallo de tutela
  • Competencia excepcional para conocer solicitud de cumplimiento
1 topic · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Con el presente auto la Sala Quinta de Revisión DECLARÓ el acatamiento de la Sentencia T-019/17, por cuanto verificó que se cumplió con la finalidad principal que pretendía el actor en la acción de tutela, consistente en la realización efectiva de la garantía constitucional del debido proceso.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. DECLARAR el cumplimiento de la sentencia T-019 de 2017, por las razones expuestas en la parte motiva de esta providencia.
  2. Segundo. Por Secretaria General, COMUNICAR a las partes del proceso de tutela la decision adoptada en esta providencia.
  3. Tercero. Contra la presente providencia no procede recurso alguno.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.